January barometer

This topic contains 3 replies, has 2 voices, and was last updated by  TS Paul 5 years, 6 months ago.

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #9760

    Paul Knox

    It looks like the month is gong to end tomorrow with the market down overall. I’ve been reading a lot about the January barometer and how the market follows whatever it does in January 90% of the time. Will that have any impact on your TSP strategy?

    #9767

    xGIOx

    Chart

    #9771

    TS Paul
    Keymaster

    Great chart, xGIOx, thanks for sharing that.

    There are lies, damned lies, and statistics. And the January barometer is accurately described below as a “Neanderthal statistic.” The results are about as correlated as the myth about the winner of the Super Bowl showing the direction of the market, so I pay it absolutely no attention at all.

    CNBC’s Alex Rosenberg did a much better job of breaking it down than I can, so with credit to that source:

    Proponents of the barometer point to the fact that over the past 35 years, the S&P 500 has followed January’s direction 71 percent of the time. However, this statistic is skewed by the fact that it includes January in that full-year performance.

    That means that in years like 1987, when the market rose 13 percent in January but finished the year just 2 percent in the green, listening to the January barometer would have yielded a loss of some 10 percent—and yet this year is still counted as a success for the barometer.

    Still, even if we merely compare January’s performance to the path that stocks beat over the following 11 months, January still appears to predict the S&P’s path 66 percent of the time. The problem is that it is much better at “predicting” winning years than losing ones.

    Going back to 1979, the S&P rose in 23 out of 35 Januarys. Over the next 11 months, the market consequently rose in 19 of those 23 years that were kicked off by winning Januarys—meaning that a positive January has successfully predicted a winning February-through-December 83 percent of the time.

    But in the 12 years when the market fell in January, the market only followed along in four years. That’s just a 33 percent success rate.

    The reason that positive Januarys prove to be a great barometer, and negative Januarys a terrible one, is the same reason that the “January barometer” appears to exist in the first place: Stocks rise.

    “It’s Neanderthal statistics,” said Mark Dow, a former hedge fund manager who currently writes at the Behavioral Macro blog. “You could say rain in Scotland predicts the money supply in the U.S., but that’s just because rain always falls and the money supply always grows. Well, stock markets tend to go up.”

    “It’s one of those rules that traders throw around because we have to have simplicity in the world we live in—otherwise we just have too much information to handle,” Dow said. “And it’s a bull—- rule.”

    Nicholas Colas, the chief market strategist at ConvergEx Group, is not quite so blunt.

    “I’m very respectful of market tradition and market history and I get why January sets the tone for the year,” Colas said on Thursday’s episode of “Futures Now.”

    He says there is a fundamental rationale behind it, which is that “if the year starts off well, then people are more happy to allocate money to risk assets, and the flow continues throughout the rule.”

    But he adds that even if there is sense behind the rule, traders would instantly take advantage of it, which would eviscerate any advantage gained by following it.

    “I get why it holds people’s attention,” Colas said. “But I’m always hesitant that anything has real value when it’s such an easily arbitrageable event.”

    The TSP Allocation Guide www.TSPallocation.com

    #9772

    TS Paul
    Keymaster

    Or, as Dan Greenhaus at BTIG explains, as goes any month, so goes the year:

    It is commonly asserted that January is an important leading indicator for full year performance. In 2008 for instance, January was down by 6.12% and the full year ended up being down 38.5% inclusive of said January. But, a quick look at other months shows the exact same trend. Taken at face value, the belief that January is an important indicator of the twelve month period imparts greater importance on January than any other month and other twelve month periods. However, when doing the same analysis on other months, we learn that:

    When February is down, the 12 month return inclusive of that February is 2.0%. When February is up, the S&P 500 returns 12.53%
    When March is down, the 12 month return inclusive of that March is 3.5%. When March is up, the S&P 500 returns 11.46%
    When April is down, the 12 month return inclusive of that April is -0.23%. When April is up, the S&P 500 returns 12.87%
    When May is down, the 12 month return inclusive of that May is 4.39%. When May is up, the S&P 500 returns 11.61%

    We could go on but you get the point. As goes any month? So goes that twelve month period.

    The TSP Allocation Guide www.TSPallocation.com

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.